STUDY OF HISTORICAL ONOMASTICS IN UZBEKISTAN LINGUISTICS

Аннотация

This article describes the study of historical onomastics in Uzbek linguistics, the study of anthroponyms in linguistics, the study of lexical and spiritual groups of onomastic units used in the study of materials of Uzbek historical onomastics and anthroponymics in onomastics, and summarizes important information about the naming traditions of the Persian-Tajik, Arab and Turkicpeoples, theirhistorical roots, and theirconnection with cultural and religious factors. The article highlights the semantics of onomastic units: anthroponym, toponym, ethnonym, hydronym and other units, and shows their significance in analyzing the level of use of Arabic, Persian-Tajik onomasticunits used in thework. Keywords: anthroponymy, Turkmen anthroponymy, toponym, historical onomastics, anthroponym, Arabic, Persian-Tajik ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ОНОМАСТИКИ В ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИИ УЗБЕКИСТАНА. Абстрактный:В данной статьеобобщенырезультаты изучения исторической ономастики вузбекском языкознании,изучения антропонимов в языкознании, изучения лексических и духовных групп ономастических единиц, используемых при изучении материалов узбекской исторической ономастики и антропонимики в ономастике, а также важные сведения о традициях имянаречения у персидско-таджикских, арабских и тюркских народов, их исторических корнях и их связи с культурными и религиозными факторами. В статье рассматривается семантика ономастических единиц: антропонимов, топонимов, этнонимов, гидронимов и других единиц, а также показана значимость анализа уровня употребления арабских и персидско-таджикских ономастических единиц, использованных вработе. Ключевые слова: антропонимия, туркменская антропонимия, топоним, историческая ономастика,антропоним,арабский,персидско-таджикский Uzbek onomastics, that is, the study of names, is one of the areas that has developed rapidly since the second half of the 20th century. In fact, it should be noted that work in the field of onomastics was carried out in the past as well. For example, the scientific and artistic activities of such scholars as Mahmud Kashgari, Alisher Navoi, and Zahiriddin Muhammad Babur can be cited. Today, in Uzbek linguistics, the following are among the studies on the study of onomastic and anthroponymic units in historical and literary texts: Sh.Yakubov's "Onomastics of Navoi's Works", N. Khusanov's "Onomastics of the Lexical-Semantic and Stylistic Features of Anthroponyms in Uzbek Written Literary Monuments", M.Turdibekov's "Shajarayi Turk" onomastics of Abulgozi Bahodirkhan1, and the studies of S.Rakhimov2, R.Khudoyberganov3, 1YoqubovSh.Navoiyasarlarionomastikasi.Fil.fan.nomz.diss.avtoref.–Toshkent,1994.–24b.;HusanovN. XVasro‘zbekadabiyyodgorliklaridagiantroponimlarningleksik-semantikvauslubiyxususiyatlari:Fil.fan.d-ri. diss.–T.:2014.–243b.;TurdibekovM. Shajaraiturkonomastikasi. –T.:Nodirabegim,2020.-103b https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi volume 4,issue4,2025 749 M.Tillayeva4, Q.Olloyorov5, Y.Avlаkulov6, R.Nuriddinova7, and D.Yuldashev8. These studies serve as a valuable source in the study of materials on Uzbek historical onomastics and anthroponymics inUzbek onomastics. Some works devoted to the study of onomastic material in written sources are mainly devoted to the onomastics of Uzbek folklore9 or the analysis of the names of prominent characters in Uzbek literary works and are of a methodological nature. In the following sense, we have in mind the articles of Y.Solijonov and S.Mo‘minov10, E.Qilichev11, U.Qosimov12, R.Kongurov and M.Mo‘minova13, Sh.Qazokov14and others. Speaking about research of this kind, it is appropriate to note some observations on the toponyms in the work “Gafur G‘ulom” by B.Choriyev and F.Eshimov and zoonyms in Uzbek folk epics. In the field of studying the anthroponymy of the Tatar language, G.F. Sattarov has achieved significant scientific results. His monograph "Tatar Anthroponymy" is a thorough and comprehensive study that sheds light on the formation, development and current state of the Tatar name system. This work provides a detailed analysis of the historical anthroponyms of the Tatar people, theirorigin, stages ofchange and thefactors that shaped them. In the framework of Turkmen linguistics, S. Ataniyazov's "Explanatory Dictionary of Turkmen Names" was an important scientific contribution to Turkmen anthroponymy. The author divided the history of the formation of Turkic anthroponymy into two stages - the general Altai period and the period of the ancient Turkic stratum. Although he did not dwell in detail on the names of thegeneral Altai period, he cited someancient words - buga,buqa, batyr, gökas examples. Also, the work of Tajik linguist A. Gafurov "Name and History" occupies a special place among onomastic studies. This work contains important information about the naming customs of the Persian-Tajik, Arab and Turkic peoples, their historical roots, and their connection with cultural and religious factors. General analysis shows that in Turkic studies, in studies related to on