Ghozi Olim Yunusov on the Vowel System of Uzbek Dialects

Аннотация

The article studies the ideas of the enlightened Jadid writer Ghozi Olim Yunusov about the vowel system in Uzbek dialects. His views on the vocalism and vowel system of Uzbek dialects are critically and analytically assessed. Keywords: - Phonetic-phonological system, vocalism, variation, diphthong, grapheme, simple vowel, obscene vowel, indifferent vowel, synharmonism. dialectology. Introduction: - The issue of the phonetic-phonological system of Uzbek dialects was the subject of research in Based on these two sources, Ghozi Olim's views on two works by Ghozi Olim. In the 12th issue of the vowels in the Uzbek language can be analyzed as journal “Maorif va o‘qitg‘uchi” in 1927, the writer follows. published an article entitled “Voices of the Uzbek He thinks about the very narrow, narrow, medium and language”, in which he tried to shed light on the wide degrees of vowels. When Ghozi Olim speaks of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of vowel three degrees of vowels, he gives explanations that and consonant phonemes in the Uzbek language, or remind us of the principle of the degree of opening of rather, in Uzbek dialects. He used the reformed Arabic the mouth in the classification of vowels, which is noted script and transcription based on the Latin alphabet. in our current literature, but in describing them, one This source was analyzed in N. Yangibaeva’s can feel that the idea is about the elongation of vowels, dissertation on “The process of Uzbek linguistics in the in particular, he explains the vowel "i" as follows: 20s of the 20th century (based on the materials of the - in closed syllables, if there is no open syllable before journal “Maorif va o‘qitg‘uchi”) [1]. In his work “An or after it, it represents a “very narrow” (tip of the experiment in the classification of Uzbek dialects”, he tongue) sound. He does not give an example of it, but notes that he wrote texts from dialects in the only says that he used it “in collecting examples.” This “international scientific phonetic alphabet (in which can be understood as follows: in words like олтим, M.F.A. is in brackets)”. However, he himself admits that бердек, the vowel i of a very narrow degree is used in he could not strictly adhere to this alphabet. He the syllables -dim, bir-; attributes this to the difficulties of the printing press. Because “the printing presses did not have letters for - if there is a closed syllable in an open syllable and scientific spelling” [4;5]. This situation is before and after it, it is a wider degree, that is, as if the understandable, since we have an idea of the state of vowel i in the syllables ki-, -di in words like kiş, keldi, technology at the time when this work was published. etc., is a “wider” degree. It can be understood as an Ghozi Olim explains that he could not show the intermediate degree; variations of phonemes in dialects or could not find a - if the open syllable is at the end of the word, there are way to show them as follows: “However, these invisible three degrees of openness (i.e. wide). Continuing this phonetic features do not have a semantic role in terms explanation, he says that the vowel “i” is pronounced of influencing the meaning, they can only be significant with an inclination to “e” and considers it a sound close in terms of pronunciation [4;5]”. In fact, it was clear to to “e”. Perhaps he meant syllables like -ki, -ngi in the Ghozi Olim that every sound is important for old and new words. It seems that in these places we are International Journal Of Literature And Languages 98 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll International Journal Of Literature And Languages (ISSN: 2771-2834) not talking about the degree of opening of the mouth, his ideas about vowels in this article. but about the short and long pronunciation of vowels. Description of simple vowels. He says that “i” is a Even then, what was said should have been reinforced narrow, very short sound that comes from the front of with examples. Indeed, in Uzbek dialects there are the tongue [4; 5]. In his previous article, he only places where the vowel “i” is pronounced long. mentioned that it is a “short and thin consonant.” Ghozi Professor K. Yudakhin, taking into account the fact that Olim also emphasizes that this sound has three degrees the vowel “i” in the Karabulak dialect is pronounced of opening in all dialects. long and in the past tense definite verb, gave a The vowel “u”. We express the labialized vowel i with transcription of the text [2;21], but Ghozi Olim does not this grapheme, he says [4;6]. This is a mistaken idea, think about this, but about the three degrees of since the vowel i can never be labialized, and moreover, openness of vowels. Such thinking does not correspond it cannot answer the question of why the vowel i should to phonetic theories, otherwise it is not possible to receive the vowel u. In the previous article, he used this determine three degrees for all vowels depending on letter to rep