Comparative Analysis of Cognitive-Pragmatic Features in The Translation of Satirical Texts

Аннотация

In our article, we present theoretical information and solutions for comparative analysis within the framework of cognitive-pragmatic features encountered in the process of translating humorous texts. To achieve an adequate translation, it is necessary to consider several important aspects. Although linguistics has long been studying wordplay, which forms the basis for creating jokes and humor, the translator should consider how to reflect various features of the source language, such as cognitive-pragmatic characteristics and existing styles, in the target text. Particular attention should be paid to these elements, especially if they are used to create a sense of humor. Keywords: Expression of humor, humorous text, cognitive-pragmatic features. should be based not on individual, disorganized Introduction: For translation theory, comparative differences, but on the systematic contrasts of studies involving source texts and translated texts are categories and series of our own and others”. of great importance from both theoretical and practical perspectives. As Komissarov noted: “Any theoretical Main part concept should be based on describing, generalizing, The foundation for conducting a comparative analysis and explaining the facts observed in the real translation in translation theory is, first and foremost, the concept process” [Komissarov, 2017, p. 112]. Such research of systematicity and the understanding that two texts allows for deeper insight into the mechanics of (for example, the original text and the translated text) translation activity, analysis of the translator's chosen can be compared to identify similarities and differences strategy, assessment of translation quality, and the within this system. study of many other aspects. Texts that can be compared when conducting Moreover, as Michael Hoey and Diane Houghton comparative studies may include: [Hoey, Houghton, 2005, p. 49] point out, the • original text - translated text; relationship between comparative analysis and translation is bilateral: on the one hand, the translation • translation 1 - translation 2 (translations of text segments can provide information for analysis, created in the same period or with a time interval); and on the other hand, analysis can explain the • original text - translation (into 1st language) - difficulties that arise in the translation process. translation (into 2nd language). However, we understand that comparison is based on Comparative analysis between two translations systematicity from the very beginning. For example, without reference to the original text is rare. The Reformatsky, in his third thesis cited in the section “On proposed cognitive-pragmatic model arises from the the Comparative Method”, also stated: “Comparison necessity to consider a holistic system of parameters International Journal Of Literature And Languages 19 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll International Journal Of Literature And Languages (ISSN: 2771-2834) encompassing factors at different levels - cognitive, in cases related to JE, translation options are extremely linguistic, and pragmatic [Brône, 2015]. This approach broad. Here, it is appropriate to recall Mona Baker's allows comparative analysis to reach an entirely new following opinion: in cases where JE exists, it is level in terms of quality and depth, as well as the permissible for the translator to apply unusual linguistic objectivity of observations and conclusions. solutions [Baker, 2011]. Simultaneously, translation science as a discipline not Moreover, sometimes it is difficult to understand how only actively but also effectively applies the concepts, the translator arrived at the final decision, since methods, and data from numerous linguistic directions countless transformations are used in the translation [Komissarov, 2017, p. 44]. Such an approach does not process. “The decision is so satisfactory that when rely solely on the field of linguistics, as it would there is a feeling that it's possible to move forward, it is otherwise lack sufficient explanatory power. Now let's almost impossible to logically analyze this decision”, examine an interesting example that, in our view, writes [Robinson, 2014, pp. 257-258]. demonstrates the explanatory potential of the “Ah, so that’s what it’s about”, muttered the professor. cognitive-pragmatic feature for comparative analysis: “Of course, of course!” He turned to Richard. “The one of two characters discusses the other's work annual Coleridge Readings”, he said thoughtfully, related to computer technologies. However, this nodding his head. “You see, he's a graduate of our conversation is not well-received by the first character, college”, he added after a pause. “Samuel Taylor since it takes place at a dinner organized in honor of a Coleridge. I hope you've heard of him. This is a dinner great poet, and perhaps in this situation, a discussion in his honor. Not literally, of course. That wouldn't be of lofty topics w