Dictionary Work in The Process of Studying Literary Texts

Аннотация

The words used in the literary works discussed in this article differ from those used in everyday speech and in popular scientific texts. Such differences, particularly in terms of speech styles, have been thoroughly examined in the field of linguistics. The use of words in literary works has also been studied in terms of frequency of use. According to the calculations in S.Rizayev and N.Buronov’s “Frequency Dictionary of the Language of the Story of Abdulla Qahhor “Sinchalak”, a total of 37,482 words are used in this work, representing 10,590 vocabulary units. Understanding the content of literary texts in Uzbek language classes largely depends on the extent to which students have mastered lexical and grammatical materials. L.A.Sheiman states that “vocabulary formation is the main way to overcome the language “barrier” that stands in the way of students mastering samples of Russian literature in the original” In the study of samples of Uzbek literature, this path becomes even more important given that the Uzbek speech of Russian-speaking students is not up to standard. Keywords: Frequency dictionary, linguistic features of the work, theoretical aspect, literary theory, study of vocabulary, literary-theoretical concepts, samples of Uzbek literature, Russian-speaking students, Uzbek speech, lively speech, artistic language skills, polysemy, transfer of word meanings. Qahhor's Novella “Sinchalak”,” a total of 37,482 words Introduction: In Uzbek language classes, the accuracy, were used in this work, representing 10,590 unique completeness, and depth of reading comprehension vocabulary units. In contrast, according to the and artistic perception of literary texts largely depend requirements of the State Educational Standard for on how well the lexical and grammatical materials “Uzbek Language”, a total of 2,100 vocabulary units are within them have been mastered. L.A.Sheyman states, to be studied in grades 2-9. These figures highlight the “Building vocabulary is the primary means of significant disparity between the two. This distinction overcoming the language “barrier” that students face represents only one aspect of the difficulties associated when studying examples of Russian literature in the with lexical coverage in understanding literary texts. original”. This approach becomes even more crucial Other challenges arise from polysemy, figurative when studying examples of Uzbek literature, language, and other linguistic phenomena. considering that the Uzbek speech of Russian-speaking students is not at the required level. The linguistic features of a work of art are examined in depth from a theoretical standpoint. This issue has Words used in literary works have certain differences been thoroughly examined in books on literary theory, from both the lexicon of everyday speech and the manuals for studying literary-theoretical concepts and vocabulary found in popular science texts. Such studies analyzing the language of works of art. differences, especially those in speech styles, have H.Ne’matov and R.Rasulov define the semantics of been thoroughly examined in linguistics. The use of expression in the meaning of a word as “semases that, words in literary works has also been studied in terms in addition to the term's meaning, denote various of their frequency of occurrence. According to the additional meanings (stylistic colouring, personal calculations by S.Rizayev and N.Buronov in their attitude, scope of application)” when covering the “Frequency Dictionary of the Language of Abdulla American Journal Of Philological Sciences 151 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) lexicon of the Uzbek language on the basis of since most metaphors give such important qualities in component analysis. artistic speech as emotionality, expressiveness, impressionability, and imagery. The linguopoetic basis In his research work on the topic “Chulpon’s Artistic of any simile is the metaphor standard. The originality Language Mastery”, M.Yuldoshev speaks in detail of a simile arises according to the originality of the about the descriptive possibilities of synonymous and metaphor standard. The metaphor standards in a antonymous words. For example, he states that in the number of similes in our speech, such as rough as a Uzbek language, the word burkamoq has a much larger bear, gentle as a sheep, cunning as a fox, white as number of wrapping signs than the word oʻramoq. This cotton, and hard as a stone, are considered traditional is because its semantic construction contains an similes because they have lost their originality”. additional semantic meaning of “leaving no open space”. This is why, in this passage, Chulpon chose the M.M.Yuldoshev, recalling M.Mukarramov's opinion word burkamoq rather than oʻramoq to express the that traditional similes have lost their figurative and relevant content, thereby increasing the clarity and emotional-expressive properties, emp