COMMUNICATIVE-PRAGMATIC GROUNDS FOR THE STUDY OF INTRODUCTORY AND INSERTION ELEMENTS

Аннотация

The article deals with the study of introductory and insertion elements, which help communicators during the processes of discourse generation, actualization and perception. The research is based on Communicative-pragmatic aspect. Functional polysemy, a characteristic feature of many discourse marker as English, is realized on two levels – beyond the pragmatic functions of these words and within them. Key words: discourse markers, polysemy, functional polysemy, Russian language, English language, desemantization. Communicative-pragmatic studies of introductory and insertion elements represent a linguistic direction within the framework of a system-structural approach to language cognition, the object of which is a language in human activity, a language in the process of interpersonal interaction.In the 20th century, within the framework of a system-structural approach to language cognition under the influence of theoretical developments of the classics of domestic linguistics (A.A. Potebni, JI.B. Scherby, A.M. Peshkovsky, E.D. Polivanova, L.P. Yakubinsky, V.A. Zvegintseva), prominent domestic psychologists (JI.C. Vygotsky, N.I. Zhinkina, A.N. Leontyeva, A.R. Luria, S.L. Rubinstein) and foreign researchers (W. von Humboldt, E. Benvenist, L. Wittgenstein, P. Grice, T. van Dyck, C. Morris, D. Austin, C. Pierce, J. Ser la, etc.) a multi-discipline of the communicative-pragmatic direction was formed in linguistics. The current state of the problem of metalanguage components as a universal syntactic category requires taking into account the anthropocentric factor in language, the behavior of the human person in the process of communication (communicative attitudes and emotional state of participants in speech communication, ways to influence the recipient of speech, etc.). Based on the concept of human activity, researchers are increasingly paying attention to the social, psychological, pragmatic aspects of the speech behavior of the person. This trend is primarily associated with the problem of learning "language in action," within the framework of which modern linguistic research is being conducted. 4 Iyun, 2025-Yil A person reports facts and events or indicates reactions to them, verbalizes feelings and desires in a certain way in the process of cognitive activity, verbally forms concepts, thoughts and conclusions, enters into communicative contacts, encourages the interlocutor to this or that action. All this variety of speech needs and manifestations in their communicative completeness is realized primarily through syntax, using the syntactic resources of the language.One of these language resources is the system of introductory elements that has developed in the syntax of the Russian language, forming a "communicative-pragmatic category with the general content of the subjective, evaluative attitude of the speaker to the statement" [LecantPA, 1998:3] and insert elements with varying degrees of communicative setting, which can be qualified "as additional to the content of the main sentence" [Gusarenko C.B., 1999:6] and text of a certain compositional type.The interpretation of introductory words, phrases and inserted sentences is one of the unresolved linguistic problems, although it attracted the attention of many researchers. Thus, linguists have repeatedly turned to the study of the history of introductory words in Russian (I.A. Babakova 1955, V.A. Glukhova 1977), to the consideration of the grammatical and semantic properties of introductory words and phrases (A.I. Anikin 1956, A.I. Studnev 1969, P.A. Markaryan 1987, P.A. Lekant 1988, L.I. I. Vasilenko 1990), to the specifics of the connection of introductory elements with the statement (A.M. Peshkovsky 1938,A.A. Shakhmatov 1941, A.I. Anikin 1956, A.G. Rudnev 1968, I.I. Meshchaninov 1976), to consider introductory units as one of the means of expressing the modality of a sentence (V.V. Vinograd 1950, A.A. Kornilov 1973,B.Z. Panfilov 1977, G.P. Nemets 1991), to the analysis of the modal characteristic of the introductory components (A.I. Ostanin 1968, V.V. Vostokov 1976, E.S. Yakovleva 1984, E.I. Belyaeva 1991, T.I. Steksova 1992, I.V. Stolyarova 1992), to their intonation features (R.M. Romanova 1971, Z.M. Bazarbayeva 1991), to the study of the functioning of introductory and insertion components as part of various types of sentences, as part of the text.A.I. Studneva 1969, M.S. Chertkova 1969, V.V. Amosova 1971, J.I.B. Anisimova 1982, G.A. Zolotova 1983, A.M. Baranov, I.M. Kobozeva 1984, C.B. Gusarenko 1999, Yu.G. Polyakova 2001). Special cases of the union function of introductory components in the structure of the sentence (text) were also considered (M.E. Boskova 1959, N.V. Muravyova 1980, T.S. Algazina 1994) However, despite the fact that a variety of introductory and insertion elements have long been the subject of close attention of linguists, their interpretation and description methods are still different. Moreover, the researchers use different